Code Of Conduct

  • Comments here are unmoderated and are operated on a use-until-abused basis. I will adopt a moderation policy if I feel that my visitors abuse this privilege.

    I will delete any comment that is lewd, crude, lascivious, racist, sexist, libelous, off-topic, or injurious to the privacy of a non-public individual. Such users will be forever banned from commenting on this site.

    From time to time, certain comments will be investigated if they appear to be marketing spam. The offending company gets one free pass before public censure.

    In short, treat me as your host and I will treat you as my guest.

Twitter

« An Open Letter to Jimmy Wales and Wikipedia | Main | Edelman Featured in Social Media Chapter of PR/Marketing Textbook »

Thursday, January 05, 2012

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

A Facebook User

Responsible editing by public relations practitioners is welcome on Wikipedia provided our conflict of interest guidelines are followed.

Most reported trouble involves over the top behavior.

Tony Ahn

Hi, to the author of this article, I'm a PR practitioner that has been quietly working on a solution to this issue for a while now, and I've come up with something that has satisfied several administrators and even a member of WMF. Feel free to contact me for more information. My Wikipedia username is I'm Tony Ahn

Joe

Wikipedia has strict notability and content guidelines that would seemingly put it immediately at odds with Public Relations purposes.

There’s no worse PR than when some politician’s office or PR company is caught editing entries for their clients. I’m sure it can be done – extremely carefully so it flies below the radar of most Wikipedia editors.

Any steps taken to reconcile the open-source ethos of Wikipedia with corporate PR needs are a positive thing, in my opinion.

oth

I followed a link from Wikipedia to this blog. I am interested in increasing the number of companies with a Wikipedia entry. I have witnessed first hand the bias at Wikipedia against adding such material (see for example the article about Realtytrac that was only revived recently after being deleted more than once).

I am dismayed though that you have chosen to communicate through a Facebook Group. I wonder why the contents of this Group are not available to the public (I will not join Facebook)?

The comments to this entry are closed.

www.flickr.com